Security Council Resolution 2825 of 29 June 2026

(Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo)

Authors

  • Dr. Hammar Bououn Associate Professor, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Jeddah University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33193/AJHASS.113

Keywords:

Security Council Resolution 2825, Democratic Republic of Congo

Abstract

The paper examines UN Security Council Resolution 2825 of 29 June 2026 concerning the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It analyzes the legal basis and substance of the Resolution under the UN Charter, particularly Chapters VI and VII.

The paper explains that the Security Council initially addressed the Congolese conflict through peaceful settlement mechanisms under Chapter VI beginning in 1999. However, due to the continuation and escalation of the conflict, the Council progressively relied on Chapter VII, determining that the situation in the DRC constituted a threat to international peace and security. This enabled the Council to adopt non-military coercive measures under Article 41 of the UN Charter.

The paper analyzes the Resolution through two dimensions: its guiding content, which calls for respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the DRC, non-interference, cessation of hostilities, withdrawal of Rwandan forces, and an end to support for armed groups; and its decisive/operative content, which extends previous measures and broadens their application to individuals and entities obstructing the UN stabilization mission or undermining peace and stability.

The paper concludes that the Resolution represents another stage in the gradual evolution of the Security Council’s involvement in the DRC conflict. The Council has continued to rely mainly on non-military measures under Article 41 rather than military enforcement measures under Article 42. The paper also criticizes the limited involvement of regional organizations, particularly the African Union, in the formulation and implementation of Security Council measures, arguing that greater regional cooperation could enhance their effectiveness.

References

1-Goma, Kiwanja, Dungu, c’est la Nation qui pleure ses enfants, Miméo, Comité permanent des êvêques de la RDC, octobre, 2008.

2-Pierre Jacquemot, « Ressources minérales, armes et violences dans les Kivus (RDC) », Hérodote, n°134, 2009.

3-Reid, Richard J. A History of Modern Africa. Blackwell Pub, 2026., Strachan, Hew. The Oxford Illustrated History of the First World War. Oxford University Press, 2016.

4-Turquoi Jean Pierre, « Pékin convoite les richesses minières de la RDC »,le Monde du 11 octobre 2007

5-Natural Resource Exploitation and Human Rights, 1993 to 2009, Global Witness, décembre 2009

6- Kalulambi Pongo, Martin. Transition et conflits politiques au Congo, « la rébellion, la résistance et Mobutu, chronique d’un désastre annoncé », Paris, Karthala, 2001, 366 pages.

7-Lanotte, Olivier, République Démocratique du Congo, Guerres sans frontières, Éd. Complexe ; Bruxelles : GRIP, 2003, 264 pages.

8-Ngal Georges, Reconstruire la RDCongo, un projet de société, Paris l’Harmattan, 2006, 296 pages.

9-Mfuadi,Tshibasu. Le calvaire d’un diplomate du Congo-Zaïre, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2004, 320 pages.

10-Daniel C. , « Bientôt des 50 de l’O.N.U… » Déf., Nat. 1994 10 ـ, p. 52.

11-Otunnu (O.A.), « Préserver la légitimité de l’action des Nations Unies », Politique Etrangère 1993/3, pp. 597- 61.

12-Michel Virally: «L’organisation mondiale », Librairie Armand Colin, paris, 1er éd. 1922, p. 161.

13-Michel Virally, les actes unilatéraux des organisations internationales, in, D.I ـ Bilan et Perspectives, tome I, Mohamed Bedjaoui, rédacteur général, A. Pedone, 1er éd. 1991, Paris, p. 254.

14-Christakis (Thodore), l’O.N.U., le cahpitre VIII et la crise Yougoslave, Monchrestien, C.E.D.I.N., 1996, Paris.

15- Ghozali Nassereddine, Les zones d’influence et le D.I.P. : aspects juridiques de la politique des grandes puissances O.P.U. 1er éd., 1985, Paris.

ـ16-Ch. Chaumont, « l’équilibre des organes pol. Des Nations Unies et la crise des Nations Unies », A.F.D.I., 1965, p. 428.

17-.E. Jimenez de Arechaga, Le traitement des différends par le C.S., R.C.A.D.I ـ .p. 57 ـ I ـ 1

18-Hubert Therry, les résolutions des organes internationaux dans la jurisprudence de la C.I.J., R.C.A.D.I., 1980 ـ II, p. 432

19- E. Jimenez de Arechaga, Le traitement des différends par le C.S., R.C.A.D.I ـ .p. 57 ـ I ـ 1954

20- Louis B. Soh, the security conncil’s Role in the settlement of international disputes A.J.I.L. 1984, n°2, pp. 402 404

21-Braeckman Collette, Les nouveaux prédateurs, Politique des puissances en Afrique CentraleParis, Fayard, 2002, 309 pages. Braeckman, Collette, l’enjeu congolais, Paris, Fayard, 1999, 414 pages.

22-Braeckman, Colette. Terreur africaine : Burundi, Rwanda, Zaïre : les racines de la violence, Paris, Fayard, 1996, 350 pages

23-Braeckman, Collette, Rwanda : Histoire d’un génocide, Paris, Fayard, 1994, 351 pages.

24-Braeckman, Colette. Le dinosaure, le Zaïre de Mobutu, Paris, Fayard, 1992, 383 pages

25-Brown, Michael E. “Ethnic and Internal conflicts, causes and implications”, in Chester Crocker,Turbulent Peace, the challenges of managing international conflict, USIP, 2001, p. 209-226.

26-Brown, Michael E, (2001), Nationalism and Ethnic conflict, the MIT Press, London, 475 pages.

27-Byman, Daniel (2002), Keeping the peace, lasting solutions to ethnic conflict, John Hopkins Press, 296 pages

28-Chapleau, Ph., Misser, F., Mercenaires S.A, Paris, Desclée DeBrouwer, 1998, 283 pages.

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Dr. Hammar Bououn. (2026). Security Council Resolution 2825 of 29 June 2026: (Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo). Arab Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, (11), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.33193/AJHASS.113

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.